Com. v. McNeal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a fact finder evaluating witness credibility can “choos[e] between competing accounts offered by different witnesses” as well as resolve “conflicts in a single witness’[s] testimony”
• recognizing that a fact finder evaluating witness credibility can “choos[e] between competing accounts offered by different witnesses” as well as resolve “conflicts in a single witness’[s] testimony”
• explaining a fact finder may “resolv[e] conflicts in a single witness’[s] testimony, accepting that part of the testimony it deems credible and rejecting the portion it deems incredible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).