Skip to main content
· 4/10/2012

Austin v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 723 S.E.2d 633
  • 60 Va. App. 60
  • 2012 WL 1158738
  • 2012 Va. App. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “evasive conduct” and “a general lack -6- of communication with the victims about any problems or other reasons asserted for non-payment or non-performance” is probative of intent to defraud
  • considering similar post-fraud behavior as evidence of intent to defraud at an earlier time
  • “[E]vidence that the accused ‘perpetuated more than one fraud [at] about the same time is relevant to show his fraudulent intent.’” (second alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Felton, Elder, Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.