Vincent v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the specific intent with which an unlawful entry is made may be inferred from the surrounding facts and circumstances” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reversing a conviction for violating Code § 18.2-91 because intent was a required element of the offense and was not proved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).