Skip to main content

Com. v. Dixon, T.

Citations

  • 276 A.3d 794
  • 2022 Pa. Super. 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s prima facie challenge at the preliminary hearing was harmless where the appellant was convicted of the offenses beyond a -8- J-S08007-26 reasonable doubt
  • providing that the standard for a motion for a directed verdict is identical to sufficiency of evidence challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.