Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/28/2013

Commonwealth v. Collins

Citations

70 A.3d 1245
2013 Pa. Super. 158
2013 WL 3270834
2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a jury can infer an agreement for conspiracy purposes where the defendant and a cohort arrive and leave the crime scene together
stating that \[a]n appellate court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact\
stating that “[a]n appellate court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact”
stating that “[a]n appellate court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact”
stating that “[a]n appellate court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact”
stating that “[a]n appellate court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the finder of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colville, Lazarus, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.