Massachusetts Appeals Court· 8/18/2008
Colorio v. Marx
Citations
- 72 Mass. App. Ct. 382
- 892 N.E.2d 356
- 2008 Mass. App. LEXIS 891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although husband not adjudged in contempt, judge properly could enforce parties’ separation agreement to ensure that wife received her agreed share of marital estate
- interpretation of separation agreement is question of law subject to plenary review
- contract interpretation is question of law \afforded plenary review\
- substance, rather than label attached to motion, controls
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gelinas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Casella Waste Management of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-04-19· cited 31×
- In Re N2N Commerce, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2009-05-01· cited 8×
- Freidus v. HartwellMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-09-28· cited 6×
- CANDACE M. DUVAL v. SHANE A. DUVAL.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-09-23· cited 6×
- University of Pennsylvania v. HalpernMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2009-09-15· cited 5×
- Pedersen v. KlareMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-07-23· cited 4×
- GERALDINE GRIFFIN v. HARRY MICHAEL KAY.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-06-15· cited 3×
- Piwowarczyk v. PiwowarczykMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-08-16
- Harrington v. HarringtonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-10-16
- Strayton v. WillwerthMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-12-08
- Muellner v. MuellnerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-06-21
- Wolff v. WolffMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-08-08
- Heine v. HeineMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-09-10
- McNamara v. McNamaraMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-09-05
- Marshall v. MarshallMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-10-23
- MCR LABS, LLC v. ANALYTICS LABS, LLC & OthersMassachusetts Superior Court· 2025-11-05
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-02-09· cited 290×
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-11-27· cited 164×
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-02-06· cited 125×
- Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-13· cited 111×
- Gallant v. WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-06-04· cited 94×
- Suffolk Construction Co. v. Lanco Scaffolding Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-09-15· cited 87×
- In Re Power Recovery Systems, Inc., Debtor (Two Cases). David W. Eck v. Dodge Chemical Company, David W. Eck v. Dodge Chemical CompanyFirst Circuit· 1991-11-27· cited 85×
- Bowers v. Board of Appeals of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-05-17· cited 66×
- Cormier v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-08-01· cited 66×
- Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-04-02· cited 54×
- Lambley v. KamenyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-08-01· cited 36×
- Parrish v. ParrishMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-02-05· cited 30×
- Fried v. FriedMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-11-02· cited 29×
- Cabot v. CabotMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-09-09· cited 24×
- MacDonald v. HawkerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-05-27· cited 22×
- South County Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. Town of South KingstownFirst Circuit· 1998-11-23· cited 21×
- Ruml v. RumlMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-11-21· cited 20×
- Sparks v. Microwave Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-06-09· cited 15×
- Ciccone v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-04-09· cited 12×
- King v. AllenMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-01-10· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.