Skip to main content

Fried v. Fried

Citations

  • 368 N.E.2d 1222
  • 5 Mass. App. Ct. 660
  • 1977 Mass. App. LEXIS 693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court must interpret clause as it is, not as it might have been had the parties distinguished the modifying phrase by preceding it with a comma

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale, Armstrong, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.