Skip to main content
· 5/17/1983

Bowers v. Board of Appeals of Marshfield

Citations

  • 448 N.E.2d 1293
  • 16 Mass. App. Ct. 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • 'Notwithstanding the powerful interest in finality of judgments, a motion for relief from a judgment which was void from its inception lies without limitation of time'
  • “[Consent judgments] are a useful device to resolve disputes and are as much an adjudication for purposes of applying the principle of judgment preclusion as any other final judgment.”
  • appropriate for a public authority to use Rule 60(b)(6) to secure relief from a consent judgment that contained a restriction it lacked the power to impose
  • allegedly erroneous judgment \is not susceptible to attack as void\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Kaplan, Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.