Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/28/2009
Collins v. Northern Trust Co.
Citations
- 391 Ill. App. 3d 882
- 330 Ill. Dec. 893
- 909 N.E.2d 915
- 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing the facts under both the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 174 (1959) and Illinois law, and stating unless a Restatement section has been adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court, it is not the law, and merely provides guidance
- analyzing the facts under both the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 174 (1959) and Illinois law, and stating unless a Restatement section has been adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court, it is not the law, and merely provides guidance
- “Restatements are not binding on Illinois courts unless adopted by our supreme court . . . [they] merely provide[] guidance.”
- “[w]e must not consider words and phrases in isolation; rather, we must interpret words and phrases in light of other relevant provisions and interpret the statute as a whole”
- “[w]e must not consider words and phrases in isolation; rather, we must interpret words and phrases in light of other relevant provisions and interpret the statute as a whole”
- “[w]e must not consider words and phrases in isolation; rather, we must interpret words and phrases in light of other relevant provisions and interpret the statute as a whole”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Malley, McLaren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mary Scanlan v. Marshall EisenbergSeventh Circuit· 2012-01-20· cited 80×
- In re Estate of ZivinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-02-19· cited 12×
- Tilschner v. SpanglerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-05-06· cited 10×
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-12-18· cited 8×
- In re S.F.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-11-18· cited 8×
- In Re Estate of LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-05-28· cited 7×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marshall v. Burger King Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 606×
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 324×
- Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court· 1956-03-22· cited 248×
- King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-04-21· cited 218×
- Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-01-31· cited 208×
- Alvarez v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 137×
- Orlak v. Loyola University Health SystemIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 101×
- Horak v. BirisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-01-23· cited 69×
- Williams v. StaplesIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-01-23· cited 64×
- In Re Marriage of CrookIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 56×
- In Re Estate of SwiecickiIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 47×
- Harrisonville Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-09-23· cited 47×
- In Re Marriage of ChrobakAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-24· cited 35×
- Erlich v. First Nat'l Bank of PrincetonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-12-12· cited 34×
- In Re Estate of ScharlachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-08-29· cited 33×
- In re CorringtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1888-03-28· cited 30×
- In Re Estate of PirieAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-03-18· cited 25×
- Kingsbury v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-10-31· cited 25×
- Busby v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois· 1937-02-09· cited 25×
- Matter of Estate of DyniewiczAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-03-31· cited 24×
Other cases named Collins v. Northern Trust Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.