Collins v. Northern Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing the facts under both the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 174 (1959) and Illinois law, and stating unless a Restatement section has been adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court, it is not the law, and merely provides guidance
• analyzing the facts under both the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 174 (1959) and Illinois law, and stating unless a Restatement section has been adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court, it is not the law, and merely provides guidance
• “Restatements are not binding on Illinois courts unless adopted by our supreme court . . . [they] merely provide[] guidance.”
• “[w]e must not consider words and phrases in isolation; rather, we must interpret words and phrases in light of other relevant provisions and interpret the statute as a whole”
• “[w]e must not consider words and phrases in isolation; rather, we must interpret words and phrases in light of other relevant provisions and interpret the statute as a whole”
• “[w]e must not consider words and phrases in isolation; rather, we must interpret words and phrases in light of other relevant provisions and interpret the statute as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Collins v. Northern Trust Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Collins v. Northern Trust Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1965-09-16· cited 1×