Skip to main content
· 12/12/1984

Erlich v. First Nat'l Bank of Princeton

Citations

  • 505 A.2d 220
  • 208 N.J. Super. 264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding professional investor to a professional standard of care requiring it to “give prudent advice”
  • finding the language \will not be liable in any way\ when used to waive all liability of a bank and its service providers was unenforceable
  • “[Defendant] offered plaintiff professional investment advisory services .... It is therefore the degree of care, knowledge and skill expected of professional investment advisers to which we must look for the standard of care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.