Kingsbury v. Powers
Citations
- 131 Ill. 182
- 22 N.E. 479
Syllabus
<p>1. Guardian and ward—protecting the ward’s estate—paying debts— incurring costs and expenses, etc.—reimbursing the guardian. If a guardian promises, on a sufficient consideration, to pay a debt of Ms ward, he will become personally liable on his promise, though made expressly as guardian, and it is a sufficient consideration if such promise discharge the debt of the ward; and a guardian who thus discharges the debt of his ward may lawfully indemnify himself out of the ward’s estate, or, if he be discharged from his guardianship, he may have an action against the ward for money paid to his use.</p> <p>2. A guardian, under authority from the county court to contract for the building of business houses on his ward’s ground, made a contract with one for the furnishing of cut stone, to the amount of $19,504. Before the completion of the buildings the guardian resigned, and the ward’s mother was appointed as his successor, who refused to pay a balance of nearly $6000 claimed by the contractor for the stone and some extra work, on the ground of damages caused by delay in completing the contract. The latter sued the prior guardian on his contract, and the second guardian employed attorneys to defend the suit, which was finally compromised for $4000. Before such compromise the second guardian resigned, and her successor paid the judgment of $4000 against the first guardian: Held, that as the suit was defended in good faith and resulted in benefit to the ward’s estate, the guardian last appointed was, in the settlement of his account, entitled to a credit for the amount of the judgment and costs paid by him, including reasonable attorney’s fees.</p> <p>3. A guardian may not willfully or recklessly incur costs and expenses in litigation, where he knows, or where by the exercise of ordinary prudence and caution he might have known, there was no necessity for litigation. But if he has reason to believe, and does believe, that a claim made against the estate is unjust and ille
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A guardian is required to observe that care and diligence in the performance of his duties that a good and conscientious business man exercises in his own affairs, under like circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bailey, Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. HillIllinois Supreme Court· 1944-09-19· cited 44×
- Bradner Smith & Co. v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1899-02-17· cited 27×
- Bliss v. SeamanIllinois Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 25×
- Andrus v. BlazzardUtah Supreme Court· 1901-02-04· cited 22×
- Conant v. LansdenIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-03-22· cited 15×
- Cheney v. RoodhouseIllinois Supreme Court· 1890-11-01· cited 15×
- Elder v. WhittemoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1893-11-27· cited 15×
- Collins v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-05-28· cited 13×
- Forbes v. BurketDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-01-05· cited 8×
- Nagle v. RobinsWyoming Supreme Court· 1900-09-07· cited 8×
- First State Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1922-02-22· cited 8×
- In Re Estate of LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-05-28· cited 7×
- Wahl v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois· 1925-06-09· cited 6×
- Quick v. QuickAppellate Court of Illinois· 1948-02-25· cited 4×
- Rawson v. CorbettIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-06-19· cited 3×
- Payne v. RechOhio Court of Appeals· 1917-03-14· cited 2×
- First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank v. CutlerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1938-01-17· cited 2×
- Reinhold v. LingbeekAppellate Court of Illinois· 1943-12-28· cited 2×
- Moore v. State Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court· 1920-02-18
- Steffenson v. BostromAppellate Court of Illinois· 1913-04-03
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Millard v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-01-24· cited 39×
- Sperry v. FanningIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-09-15· cited 25×
- Smith v. Kennard'sSupreme Court of Alabama· 1863-01-15· cited 20×
- Caldwell v. Young & MorganTexas Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 17×
- Kingsbury v. SperryIllinois Supreme Court· 1887-01-25· cited 16×
- James Morgan v. HoytIllinois Supreme Court· 1873-09-15· cited 9×
- Gardner v. MaroneyIllinois Supreme Court· 1880-06-16· cited 6×
- Moses v. MosesSupreme Court of Georgia· 1873-07-15· cited 5×
Other cases named Kingsbury v. Powers
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.