Skip to main content
D. South Carolina· 3/25/2016

Colleton v. Charleston Water System

Citations

  • 225 F. Supp. 3d 362
  • 2015 WL 9255325
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the majority position is that a negligent supervision claim does not require physical harm,” and listing cases
  • finding that allegations that defamatory statement “occurred in the workplace[] and was overheard by one or more CWS employees” was “still insufficient for notice pleading”
  • dismissing allegation that the defamatory statement “was heard,” even if the court drew the inference that the statement was heard in the workplace
  • “Defendants cannot be expected to defend against an allegation that [they] defamed [the plaintiff] by making a statement heard by unknown persons at an unknown place at an unknown time.”
  • “Individual employees are not proper defendants for Title VII claims . . . .”
  • same, for allegation that the speaker “was heard” when he made the statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gergel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.