Jones v. Calvert Group, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs retaliatory termination claim was sufficiently related to allegations in the administrative complaint so as not to require separate administrative exhaustion
• concluding that federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction “when the charge-filing requirement is not satisfied”
• holding that a plaintiff’s “failure . . . to exhaust 3 administrative remedies concerning a Title VII claim deprives the federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction over the claim”
• holding that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction where a charge alleges only retaliation but the allegations in the federal complaint included discrimination based on age, sex, and race
• holding that plaintiff’s checking the “retaliation” box and failure to check the “age,” “sex,” or “race” boxes was a failure to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to age, sex, or race claims
• finding that a retaliation claim did not need to be exhausted where it could be construed as relating to retaliation for the filing of a second EEOC charge that gave rise to the federal complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).