Fourth Circuit· 1/5/2009

Jones v. Calvert Group, Ltd.

Citations

551 F.3d 297
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2
91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,424
105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 129
2009 WL 19133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the plaintiffs retaliatory termination claim was sufficiently related to allegations in the administrative complaint so as not to require separate administrative exhaustion
concluding that federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction “when the charge-filing requirement is not satisfied”
holding that a plaintiff’s “failure . . . to exhaust 3 administrative remedies concerning a Title VII claim deprives the federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction over the claim”
holding that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction where a charge alleges only retaliation but the allegations in the federal complaint included discrimination based on age, sex, and race
holding that plaintiff’s checking the “retaliation” box and failure to check the “age,” “sex,” or “race” boxes was a failure to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to age, sex, or race claims
finding that a retaliation claim did not need to be exhausted where it could be construed as relating to retaliation for the filing of a second EEOC charge that gave rise to the federal complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traxler, Shedd, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.