Skip to main content
· 10/3/1983

David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. Lester

Citations

  • 718 F.2d 198
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
  • holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
  • holding that district courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
  • holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
  • holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
  • holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Widener, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.