David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. Lester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
• holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
• holding that district courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
• holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
• holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections
• holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Greenspan v. Brothers Property Corp.
  D. South Carolina· 2015-04-30· cited 462×
• Wimmer v. Cook
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-09-19· cited 398×
• Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLC
  D. South Carolina· 2017-12-12· cited 361×
• Dellarcirprete v. Gutierrez
  N.D. West Virginia· 2007-03-05· cited 272×
• Field v. McMaster
  D. South Carolina· 2009-09-24· cited 194×
• United States v. Cyrus Jonathan George
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-08-12· cited 156×
• Howard's Yellow Cabs, Inc. v. United States
  W.D. North Carolina· 1997-05-19· cited 100×
• Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-04-09· cited 81×
• McPherson v. Astrue
  S.D. West Virginia· 2009-03-02· cited 75×
• United States v. Madrid
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 42×
• Solis v. Malkani
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 38×
• Earl D. Sperow v. Francis Melvin
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-08-26· cited 34×
• Keeler v. Pea
  D. South Carolina· 1992-01-09· cited 27×
• United States v. Hernandez-Aguilar
  E.D. North Carolina· 2019-02-05· cited 17×
• Toney v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n
  D. South Carolina· 2012-09-25· cited 16×
• Baldwin v. Barnhart
  E.D. North Carolina· 2005-03-24· cited 15×
• Moody-Williams v. LipoScience
  E.D. North Carolina· 2013-06-18· cited 14×
• Halloway v. Bashara
  E.D. Virginia· 1997-10-01· cited 14×
• Colleton v. Charleston Water System
  D. South Carolina· 2016-03-25· cited 12×
• Umlic Consolidated v. Spectrum Financial Services Corporation
  W.D. North Carolina· 2009-10-19· cited 10×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two Firearms
  Sixth Circuit· 1981-01-20· cited 6,283×
• Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
  First Circuit· 1980-03-11· cited 1,061×
• John B. Hull, Inc., the Sandmeyer Oil Company, Community Petroleum Products, Inc., and Dutchess Auto Co. v. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1978-11-30· cited 121×
• McCall v. Andrus
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-10-17· cited 83×
• Lorin Corporation v. Goto & Company, Ltd.
  Eighth Circuit· 1983-03-11· cited 47×
• Clifford Ray Deloney v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-11-20· cited 17×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 1978-05-10· cited 6×