Skip to main content

Coleman v. State

Citations

  • 375 S.E.2d 663
  • 189 Ga. App. 366
  • 1988 Ga. App. LEXIS 1407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police were not required to electronically record the defendant's custodial statements in order for the statements to be admissible
  • holding that police were not required to electronically record the defendant's custodial statements in order for the statements to be admissible
  • failure to record defendant’s custodial statement did not violate right to counsel, right against setf-mcrimination, right to fair trial or right to due process under state constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deen, Carley, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.