Skip to main content
· 6/21/1995

Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L.

Citations

  • 459 S.E.2d 415
  • 194 W. Va. 138
  • 1995 W. Va. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]here the issue ... is clearly a question of law or involving an interpretation of a statute, we apply a de novo standard of review”
  • holding that “[w]here the issue ... is clearly a question of law or involving an interpretation of a statute, we apply a de novo standard of review”
  • holding that “[w]here the issue ... is clearly a question of law or involving an interpretation of a statute, we apply a de novo standard of review”
  • holding that “[wjhere the issue on an appeal from the circuit court is clearly a question of law or involving an interpretation of a statute, we apply a de novo standard of review”
  • holding that “[wjhere the issue on appeal from the circuit court is clearly a question of law or involving an interpretation of a statute, we apply a de novo standard of review”
  • holding that “[w]here the issue on an appeal from the circuit court is clearly a question of law or involving an interpretation of a statute, we apply a de novo standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.