Skip to main content

Cole v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 428 S.E.2d 303
  • 16 Va. App. 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that judges are uniquely qualified “‘to separate, during the mental process of adjudication, the admissible from the inadmissible, even though he has heard both.’” (quoting Eckhart v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 213, 216, 279 S.E.2d 155, 157 (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.