Court of Appeals of Virginia· 5/18/1993
Craddock v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 429 S.E.2d 889
- 16 Va. App. 402
- 9 Va. Law Rep. 1347
- 1993 Va. App. LEXIS 124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering appellant's objection despite failure to request a mistrial, because the objection was made before the judge and, thus, did not require a cautionary instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-03-09· cited 50×
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-07-12· cited 25×
- Pierce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-11-20· cited 18×
- Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-02-07· cited 7×
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-01-25· cited 3×
- Milton P. Demetre Family Ltd. Partnership v. BeckmannCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-20· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Turner v. MurraySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 533×
- Cheng v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1990-06-08· cited 243×
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-09-04· cited 78×
- Martinez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1991-04-19· cited 43×
- Cole v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-03-16· cited 33×
- Morris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-04-07· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.