Skip to main content
· 6/22/1993

Able v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 431 S.E.2d 337
  • 16 Va. App. 542
  • 9 Va. Law Rep. 1589
  • 1993 Va. App. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it is only the “fact of conviction” or the intentional misrepresentation of the “fact” that is relevant to credibility
  • where defendant failed to raise objection regarding \confusing nature\ of jury instruction at trial, he is barred from raising issue on appeal
  • where defendant failed to raise objection regarding “confusing nature” of jury instruction at trial, he is barred from raising issue on appeal
  • “Unless the prior conviction was for perjury, neither the nature of the felony nor the details of the conviction are admissible.”
  • where defendant failed to raise objection regarding “confusing nature” of jury instruction at trial, he is barred from raising issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.