Skip to main content

Cobell v. Norton

Citations

  • 260 F. Supp. 2d 98
  • 2003 WL 1960020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that an “ERISA cause of action accrues and the limitations period begins to run when a claim for benefits is clearly and unequivocally denied” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • noting that above-cited rule is “well-established in recognized treatises on trust law”
  • repudiation of express trust must be clear and continuing act to prevent the beneficiary from enjoying benefits of trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.