District of Columbia· 11/5/1998
Cobell v. Babbitt
Citations
- 30 F. Supp. 2d 24
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18517
- 1998 WL 824552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[njeither the plain language nor the legislative history of the tolling provision can support the plaintiffs’ sweeping interpretation”
- “The question of when the plaintiffs knew or should have known of their claim is a question of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 265×
- Vanover v. HantmanDistrict of Columbia· 1999-11-19· cited 188×
- Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2004-04-07· cited 54×
- Longwood Village Restaurant, Ltd. v. AshcroftDistrict of Columbia· 2001-07-26· cited 48×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-12-21· cited 47×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2005-12-19· cited 41×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-12· cited 41×
- Gros Ventre Tribe v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2006-11-13· cited 37×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-02-22· cited 33×
- Cobell v. SalazarD.C. Circuit· 2009-07-24· cited 27×
- Felter v. SalazarDistrict of Columbia· 2010-01-15· cited 25×
- Comite' De Apoyo a Los Trabajadores Agricolas v. PerezThird Circuit· 2014-12-05· cited 25×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-17· cited 23×
- Fletcher v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-03-26· cited 20×
- Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2001-11-30· cited 16×
- Oenga v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-09-18· cited 13×
- Jicarilla Apache Nation, Formerly Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-06-24· cited 9×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2003-04-28· cited 9×
- Cobell v. KempthorneDistrict of Columbia· 2008-01-30· cited 7×
- Roane v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2009-04-20· cited 7×
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 7,564×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 3,786×
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 3,342×
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 1,701×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,281×
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,275×
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court· 1948-04-13· cited 928×
- Blackie v. BarrackNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
- Edward Haase v. William S. Sessions, Director, F.B.I.D.C. Circuit· 1987-12-15· cited 742×
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court· 1972-04-24· cited 610×
- Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 600×
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-01-03· cited 519×
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 493×
- Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court· 1970-12-08· cited 419×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.