Skip to main content

Cobell v. Babbitt

Citations

  • 30 F. Supp. 2d 24
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18517
  • 1998 WL 824552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[njeither the plain language nor the legislative history of the tolling provision can support the plaintiffs’ sweeping interpretation”
  • “The question of when the plaintiffs knew or should have known of their claim is a question of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.