Gruby v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing continued vitality of Diduck but holding claims for money damages barred by Mertens
• allegations of failure to reduce benefit levels in pension fund states claim for breach of fiduciary duty
• “Clearly, Fund employers are parties with interests adverse to those of plan Members. Indeed, the employers’ interests lie in minimizing their obligations to the Fund, whereas the Fund’s interest is in collecting all contributions owed.”
• “Clearly, Fund 8 employers are parties with interests adverse to those of plan Members. Indeed, 9 the employers’ interests lie in minimizing their obligations to the Fund, whereas 10 the Fund’s interest is in collecting all contributions owed.”
• allegations sufficient to establish knowledge element where plaintiff alleged that- defendant — a consultant to the pension fund — consulted with the breaching fiduciaries of the pension fund, and was solicited by the breaching fiduciaries for advice regarding the pension fund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).