District of Columbia· 11/12/2002
Cobell v. Norton
Citations
- 231 F. Supp. 2d 295
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21726
- 2002 WL 31513592
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘There is no better indication of what the market will bear than what the lawyer in fact charges for his services and what his clients pay.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kaseman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2004-07-07· cited 85×
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-12· cited 52×
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-08-30· cited 48×
- Holbrook v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2004-02-05· cited 47×
- Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District of Columbia· 2008-03-04· cited 31×
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-15· cited 23×
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-31· cited 19×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Trade Exchange Network Ltd.District of Columbia· 2015-11-09· cited 17×
- Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. MiskiDistrict of Columbia· 2010-01-25· cited 16×
- Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict of Columbia· 2017-01-31· cited 15×
- Woodland v. Viacom Inc.District of Columbia· 2008-11-25· cited 15×
- Gray v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-04-26· cited 12×
- State of Texas v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-06-18· cited 11×
- United States v. Dynamic Visions Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-01-23· cited 8×
- Miller v. HolzmannD.C. Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 8×
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2016-05-25· cited 6×
- Carmel & Carmel PC v. Dellis Construction, Ltd.District of Columbia· 2012-05-01· cited 5×
- Fonville v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-14· cited 5×
- Walker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-05-12· cited 4×
- McKesson Corporation v. Iran, the Islamic ReDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-27· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborD.C. Circuit· 1980-09-02· cited 989×
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1984-09-28· cited 522×
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 402×
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 317×
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1988-09-16· cited 285×
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.D.C. Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 265×
- In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application)D.C. Circuit· 1995-06-09· cited 156×
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1982-10-05· cited 104×
- Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund v. Jpr, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1998-04-27· cited 95×
- Weisberg v. WebsterD.C. Circuit· 1984-12-07· cited 69×
- Oklahoma Aerotronics, Inc. v. United States of America, Oklahoma Aerotronics, Inc. v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1991-09-13· cited 53×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1998-11-05· cited 39×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1999-08-10· cited 24×
- Griffin v. Washington Convention CenterDistrict of Columbia· 2001-11-21· cited 18×
- Martini v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict of Columbia· 1997-09-10· cited 17×
- In re KormanE.D. Pennsylvania· 1959-03-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.