Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 3/15/1994
Clewis v. State
Citations
- 876 S.W.2d 428
- 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 1081
- 1994 WL 76471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the \ Jackson v. Virginia standard necessarily encompasses a factual-sufficiency review\
- explaining that the “Jackson v. Virginia standard necessarily encompasses a factual-sufficiency review”
- explaining that the “ Jackson v. Virginia standard necessarily encompasses a factual-sufficiency review”
- \general grant of [appellate] jurisdiction includes the power to review questions of law and fact \
- \general grant of [appellate] jurisdiction includes the power to review questions of law and fact \
- Jackson specifically requires the reviewing court to look at all the evidence, i.e., the facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGarry, Lagarde, Barber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-09· cited 6,445×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-06· cited 6,365×
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-31· cited 5,788×
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-10-18· cited 4,543×
- Giles v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2007-08-10· cited 151×
- Temple v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-12-21· cited 124×
- McGill v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2006-08-22· cited 92×
- Mata v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-02-05· cited 56×
- Foley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2010-12-21· cited 52×
- Alami v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-01-20· cited 51×
- White v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1994-11-29· cited 45×
- Bath v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1997-08-14· cited 39×
- Streff v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1994-11-03· cited 18×
- Muhammad v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1995-11-16· cited 15×
- Mares v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1995-10-18· cited 15×
- Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1994-06-14· cited 12×
- House v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1994-07-14· cited 8×
- Long v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-07-12· cited 7×
- Raymond Edward Long v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-05-31
- Brian Haun v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-05-03
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court· 1986-02-12· cited 4,555×
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court· 1951-12-05· cited 4,309×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,060×
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1986-04-02· cited 2,766×
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 2,504×
- Geesa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-29· cited 1,851×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,268×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-05· cited 713×
- Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-17· cited 577×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-15· cited 548×
- Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court· 1988-05-25· cited 486×
- Tibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 432×
- Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 419×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.