Skip to main content

Long v. State

Citations

  • 903 S.W.2d 52
  • 1995 WL 410725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing facial constitutional challenge to the anti-stalking statute even though defendant had not raised that issue in the trial court and holding that statute was not unconstitutionally vague
  • addressing facial constitutional challenge to the anti-stalking statute even though defendant had not raised that issue in the trial court and holding that statute was not unconstitutionally vague
  • addressing facial constitutional challenge to the anti-stalking statute even though defendant had not raised that issue in the trial court and holding that statute was not unconstitutionally vague
  • addressing facial constitutional challenge to the anti-stalking statute even though defendant had not raised that issue in the trial court and holding that statute was not unconstitutionally vague
  • facial constitutional challenge to the antistalking statute
  • facial constitutional challenge to the anti-stalking statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Smith, Dally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.