Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding conclusory and speculative testimony in affidavits and moving papers insufficient 19 to raise genuine issues of fact and defeat summary judgment
• stating conclusory and speculative testimony does 15 not raise genuine issues of fact and is insufficient to defeat summary judgment
• conclusory and speculative testimony in affidavits and moving papers is insufficient to raise genuine issues of fact and to defeat summary judgment
• in a factual attack on subject matter jurisdiction, “[n]o presumptive truthfulness attaches to 10 plaintiff's allegations”
• in a factual attack on subject matter jurisdiction, “[n]o presumptive truthfulness attaches to 19 plaintiff’s allegations.”
• in a factual attack on subject matter jurisdiction, “[n]o presumptive truthfulness attaches to 14 plaintiff’s allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).