Clements v. State
Citations
- 51 Fla. 6
Syllabus
<p>1. In a criminal case brought to an appellate court by writ oerror, where none of the evidence is incorporated in the bill of exceptions and none of the charges given by the court are incorporated either in the regular or in a statutory bill of exceptions, neither the evidence nor the charges given by the trial court are before the appellate court for consideration, and, in their absence, an appellate court must assume that the evidence was sufficient to warrant a conviction and that the charges given correctly set forth the law applicable to the case, every presumption being in favor of the correctness of the verdict and judgment rendered and entered in the trial court.</p> <p>2. In criminal as well as in civil cases an application for a continuance is addressed to the sound judicial discretion . of the trial court, and the denial of such a motion will not be reversed by an appellate court, unless there has been a palpable abuse of this judicial discretion, which must be clearly arid affirmatively made to appear in the bill of exceptions, the rule being that motions for a continuance in criminal cases are to be even more closely scanned than in civil cases, 'because of the greater temptation to delay.</p> <p>3. Evidence of the insanity of a defendant’s ancestors and relatives is not alo’ie competent or sufficient to prove that the defendant is insane, and such evidence can only be used to corroborate other evidence of his insanity. It is not error for the trial court to refuse a continuance in a criminal case in order that defendant may have an opportunity of taking testimony on commission to establish such fact, there being no offer on the part of the defendant to connect such testimony with other testimony to establish the insanity of the defendant at the time of the commission of the offense with which defendant stood charged, and the materiality of the proposed testimony in no wise being made to appear to the court.</p> <p>4. Under section 2912 of the Revise
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 35×
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 30×
- McKinnon v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 29×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 25×
- Barber v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 24×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-12-12· cited 21×
- Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 18×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 16×
- Hooker v. ForresterSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 16×
- Keigans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 12×
- Shoemaker v. PowersSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-06-24· cited 6×
- People v. HallNew York County Courts· 1945-10-18· cited 6×
- Blocker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-06-15· cited 4×
- State ex rel. Futch v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-05-02· cited 3×
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-07-02· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gladden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1868-07-01· cited 53×
- Newton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 52×
- State v. HaywardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-11-20· cited 44×
- Ballard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 38×
- Blige v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-01-15· cited 35×
- Denham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-06-15· cited 27×
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 26×
- Proctor v. HartSupreme Court of Florida· 1854-02-15· cited 23×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 22×
- Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-01-15· cited 21×
- Barber v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1869-07-01· cited 19×
- Bynum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 19×
- Newberry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1890-06-15· cited 18×
- Easterlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 16×
- Bailey v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida· 1855-04-15· cited 14×
- Burk v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida· 1858-07-01· cited 14×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 14×
- Dorman v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida· 1847-01-15· cited 10×
- Dibble v. TruluckSupreme Court of Florida· 1867-07-01· cited 10×
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.