Skip to main content

Blocker v. State

Citations

  • 60 Fla. 4

Syllabus

<p>1. In a prosecution for felony, it is essential that the record proper should clearly show that the defendant was arraigned and pleaded to the charge, and by express recital or by fair implication that the accused was personally present at every stage of the trial, and a statement in the record proper that the defendant came by his attorneys, does not imply the defendant’s personal presence.</p> <p>2. In a prosecution for larceny, it is error to refuse charges predicated upon a lawful taking of the property where that was the defense made in the evidence.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Pakkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.