Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county hospital was not a state actor, even though board members are appointed, in part, by the state
• holding that attached documents “integral to the complaint and authentic” may be considered on a motion to dismiss
• holding that attached documents “integral to the complaint and authentic” may be considered on a motion to dismiss
• explaining that the court may consider documents outside of the pleadings, “so long as they are integral to the complaint and authentic”
• stating that documents attached to the complaint may be considered “so long as they are integral to the complaint and authentic”
• finding that on a 12(b)(6) motion the court “may properly take judicial notice of matters of public record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).