Fayetteville Investors v. Commercial Builders, Incorporated American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a \district court could not act upon facts alleged or proven beyond what was stated in a complaint or amended complaint\
• holding that “in the event of a conflict between the bare allegations of the complaint and any exhibit attached pursuant to [Federal] Rule [of Civil Procedure] 10(c) the exhibit prevails”
• holding that an interlocutory order may “be reviewed by the district court on motion or sua sponte, at any time prior to the entry of final judgment”
• holding that under Rule 54(b), courts may review its own interlocutory orders sua sponte
• finding that, under Rule 54(b), “[a]n interlocutory order is subject to reconsideration at any time prior to the entry of a final judgment”
• finding that the district court correctly considered a motion for reconsideration “of a prior interlocutory order” under Rule 54(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).