Clark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding judgment in felony case where there is plea of not guilty based only on a verdict of eleven jurors violates defendant’s constitutional right of trial by jury and is absolutely void
• holding judgment in felony case where there is plea of not guilty based only on a verdict of eleven jurors violates defendant's constitutional right of trial by jury and is absolutely void
• “|T|he judgment in this case is void, because the trial was by a juror composed of only eleven jurors who returned the verdict therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Little
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-02· cited 122×
• Ex Parte Johnson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 111×
• Hatch v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-10· cited 79×
• Trinidad v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09· cited 55×
• Houston v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1956-01-04· cited 17×
• Roberts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-10· cited 14×
• Bates v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-06· cited 11×
• Dailey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-11-23· cited 7×
• Benge v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-12-16· cited 3×
• Trinidad, Frank
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1961-07-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Randel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-02-02· cited 33×
• Jester v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1888-11-03· cited 8×