Jester v. State
Citations
- 26 Tex. Ct. App. 369
- 9 S.W. 616
- 1888 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 199
Syllabus
<p>1. Petit Jury.—A constitutional jury for the trial of causes in the district court consists of twelve persons.</p> <p>3. Burglary—Theft—Indictment.—The charging clause of the indictment, in alleging the burglarious entry, as copied into the record, reads as follows: “ Then and there by force break and enter a house,” etc.,— omitting the essential word “did.” Held that, if the said word is omitted in the original indictment, it is insufficient to charge burglary. Appearing, however, in the proper connection in the clause charging theft of certain articles the indictment is sufficient as an indictment for theft.</p>
Judges: Willson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trinidad v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09· cited 55×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-03-30· cited 22×
- Zapata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-25· cited 18×
- Pass v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-06-16· cited 14×
- Trinidad, FrankCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.