Skip to main content

Ex Parte Johnson

Citations

  • 697 S.W.2d 605
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the fine assessed against the applicant was unauthorized because the law did not allow the fine in addition to a sentencing enhancement
  • holding that the fine assessed against the applicant was unauthorized because the law did not allow the fine in addition to a sentencing enhancement
  • holding that the fine assessed against the applicant was unauthorized because the law did not allow the fine in addition to a sentencing enhancement
  • reforming judgment to delete an unauthorized fine in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding, without reference to the prior cases cited above
  • following legislature’s mandate and reforming portion of verdict not authorized by law
  • jury erroneously assessed $10,000 fine in addition to enhancement of punishment that could not be imposed against defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Campbell, Onion, Clinton, Teague, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.