State of Tennessee v. Nelson Aguilar Gomez and Florinda Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, “[e]ven if evidence is inadmissible, a party may ‘open the door’ to admission of that evidence”
• concluding that testimony that the co-defendant would not hurt the child victim did not open the door for evidence regarding the co-defendant’s violent history against the defendant
• holding that introducing evidence that the defendant was not violent toward the witness’s daughter did not open the door to evidence that he was violent toward the witness
• finding that “[e]ven if evidence is inadmissible, a party may ‘open the door’ to admission of that evidence.”
• stating that, “[e]ven if evidence is inadmissible, a party may ‘open the door’ to admission of that evidence”
• finding that “[e]ven if evidence is inadmissible, a party may ‘open the door’ to admission of that evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).