Skip to main content

Arline v. State

Citations

  • 264 Ga. 843
  • 452 S.E.2d 115
  • 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 346
  • 1995 Ga. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an incriminating statement was admissible even though the detective 41 “told [the defendant] that the trial court might consider that he was not the triggerman and that he cooperated with the police”
  • stating that “telling a defendant that his or her cooperation will be made known to the prosecution does not constitute the ‘hope of benefit’ sufficient to render a statement inadmissible”
  • the “slightest hope of benefit” in OCGA § 24-3-50 is construed to mean the hope of a lighter sentence
  • “Merely telling a defendant that his or her cooperation will be made known to the prosecution does not constitute a ‘hope of benefit’ sufficient to render a statement inadmissible[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.