Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 7/17/2018

Clark v. Colbert

Citations

  • 895 F.3d 1258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “we will not question the reasoning of a district court unless an appellant ‘actually argue[s]’ against it”
  • “[W]e will not question the reasoning of a district court unless an appellant actually argues against it.” (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[W]e have never squarely held the ADA applies to arrests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Holmes, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.