City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that homeowner’s consent to search was not rendered involuntary when police officer confronted her with separation from her small'child
• holding that “deadly force was justified” where a woman charged officers with a knife
• explaining that “[o]nly public entities are subject to Title Il” of the ADA
• granting cert. to decide the issue but then dismiss- ing it as improvidently granted after San Francisco changed its argument
• requiring that law be “sufficiently definite that any reasonable official in [the defendant’s] shoes would have understood that he was violating it, meaning that the existing precedent . . . placed the statutory or constitutional questions beyond debate” (internal quotation marks omitted
• dismissing writ of certiorari as improvidently granted where adverse party abandoned the position it took in the lower court; noting that the question presented \would benefit from briefing and an adversary presentation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).