Skip to main content
D. South Carolina· 9/30/2016

Clark v. Bridges

Citations

  • 211 F. Supp. 3d 731
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135284
  • 2016 WL 5539530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a warrant was invalid because the “description of property [as ‘Stolen property’] in the instant search warrant fails to appraise an officer executing the warrant of the items to be seized”
  • There was an “obvious failure of the warrant to describe any particular thing that was to be seized [when] [t]he warrant’s description of property that is appropriate for seizure merely states [d] ‘stolen property’ . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendricks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.