· 10/22/1971
Kaplan v. Centex Corporation
Citations
- 284 A.2d 119
- 1971 Del. Ch. LEXIS 143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that control “may be exercised directly or through nominees”
- explaining that control “may be exercised directly or through nominees”
- explaining that control “may be exercised directly or through nominees”
- a plaintiff who alleges domination of a board of directors and/or control of its affairs must prove it
- to successfully allege domination in the absence of controlling stock ownership, plaintiff must allege literal control of corporate conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duffy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.