Skip to main content
· 10/22/1971

Kaplan v. Centex Corporation

Citations

  • 284 A.2d 119
  • 1971 Del. Ch. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that control “may be exercised directly or through nominees”
  • explaining that control “may be exercised directly or through nominees”
  • explaining that control “may be exercised directly or through nominees”
  • a plaintiff who alleges domination of a board of directors and/or control of its affairs must prove it
  • to successfully allege domination in the absence of controlling stock ownership, plaintiff must allege literal control of corporate conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.