Citigroup, Inc. v. Amodio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the claims were not dependent on the contract where the complaint alleged a breach \of law imposed generally to enforce public policy creating duties owed to the public at large\
• holding that the claims were not dependent on the contract where the complaint alleged a breach \of law imposed generally to enforce public policy creating duties owed to the public at large\
• acknowledging the “federal policy” favoring arbitration but explaining that a court must “mak[e] its initial construction of an agreement to arbitrate” under “general state contract law”
• giving narrow construction to an arbitration agreement providing for arbitration of “all controversies which may arise concerning any order or transaction of the construction, performance or breach of this agreement”
• “Florida’s general contract law requires that the court discern the intent of the parties from the language used in their agreement.”
• “Florida’s general contract law requires that the court discern the intent of the parties from the language used in their agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).