Dusold v. Porta-John Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(3)’s predecessor statute provided basis for appellate jurisdiction to consider court’s order dismissing action and transferring to another state for arbitration
• asserting as alternative basis for jurisdiction that when dismissal was for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, § 12-2101(D) appeal would lie because party could never have “final” judgment
• finding appellate jurisdiction under predecessor to A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(3)\to consider at least the dismissal and jurisdictional aspects of the trial court's order (transfer of arbitration to Michigan)\
• negligence and products liability action for personal injuries from chemicals not arbitra-ble under license agreement containing a “broad” arbitration clause like that of the instant case
• “While it is certainly true that this dispute would not have arisen but for the sales agreement between U.S. Home and the Seiferts, we conclude that the mere existence of such contract is not sufficient to compel that this dispute be arbitrated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).