Skip to main content
· 9/8/2006

Beazer Homes Corp. v. Bailey

Citations

  • 940 So. 2d 453
  • 2006 WL 2570564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the general rule established in Pnma Paint Corp., and noting that “the courts in this state have followed that ruling in fraud in the inducement cases, almost without exception, whether applying federal or state law.”
  • stating “arising out of’ arbitration language “used in this case has been considered sufficient to require arbitration of fraud in the inducement claims by both state and federal courts, interpreting state and federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.