Cisneros v. Kim (In Re Kim)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Golden was decided under the specific California reinvestment requirement and its holding is thus limited to its facts
• noting that Golden was decided under the specific California reinvestment requirement and its holding is thus limited to its facts
• finding that funds that were exempt from the chapter 7 debtor’s bankruptcy estate as of the petition date did not lose exemption status once distributed from the retirement plan post-petition
• finding that funds that were exempt from the chapter 7 debtor’s bankruptcy estate as of the petition date did not lose exemption status once distributed from the retirement plan post-petition
• “Whether a plan is designed and used for retirement pur- poses is a question of fact that the panel reviews for clear error.”
• \[B]ankruptcy law is clear that debtor's exemption rights are fixed as of the petition date[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).