Moldo v. Clark (In Re Clark)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he threshold question, is [the property] still property of the estate, must ... be decided” before it can be sold free and clear under § 363(f)
• holding an exemption claim that referred to property that did not exist and failed to refer to the property that did exist was not effective
• explaining that “the property that can be sold free and clear under section 363(f) is defined by subsections (b) and (c) of section 363 as ‘property of the estate.’”
• explaining that “the property that can be sold free and clear under section 363(f) is defined by subsections (b) and (c) of section 363 as ‘property of the estate.’”
• explaining that “the property that can be sold free and clear under section 363(f) is defined by subsections (b) and (c) of section 363 as ‘property of the estate.’”
• explaining that “the property that can be sold free and clear under section 363(f) is defined by subsections (b) and (c) of section 363 as ‘property of the estate.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).