Skip to main content
· 8/29/1997

Spenler v. Siegel (In Re Spenler)

Citations

  • 212 B.R. 625
  • 97 D.A.R. 12
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7910
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 12429
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The first meeting of creditors began on August 4, 1995, and, after two continuances, was concluded on September 29, 1995”
  • proper application 26 of Rule 4003(b) is a question of law which we review de novo
  • Taylor “holds that if no objection is filed 12 within the 30-day period prescribed by Rule 4003(b) the debtor's 13 claimed exemption is valid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Snyder, Hagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.