Supreme Court· 11/24/1924
White v. Stump
Citations
- 266 U.S. 310
- 45 S. Ct. 103
- 69 L. Ed. 301
- 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the right of the debtor to claim property as exempt is generally determined on the facts as they exist on the date of the filing of the petition
- stating that the Bankruptcy Act \makes the state laws existing when the petition is filed the measure of the [debtor's] right to exemptions\
- acknowledging that a debtor may claim only those exemptions available at the time of the bankruptcy petition filing
- explaining that the “state laws existing when the [bankruptcy] petition is filed [are] the measure of the right to exemptions”
- explaining that “the point of time which is to separate the old situation from the new in the bankrupt’s affairs is the date when the petition is filed”
- describing the time of fil- ing as a “line of cleavage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Devanter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re FordD. Maryland· 1980-04-15· cited 148×
- Perry v. Dearing (In Re Perry)Fifth Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 122×
- Wolfe v. Jacobson (In Re Jacobson)Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-23· cited 111×
- Myers v. MatleySupreme Court· 1943-04-05· cited 92×
- The Matter Of: Michael Zibman Jamie Bailey Zibman, Debtors. Michael Zibman Jamie Bailey Zibman v. Rodney D. Tow, TrusteeFifth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 83×
- United States v. MarxenSupreme Court· 1939-05-15· cited 71×
- In the Matter of Ronald and Marjorie Patterson, Debtors. Appeal of Abbotsford State BankSeventh Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 58×
- In the Matter Of: Thomas Cullen Davis Karen Joyce Davis, Debtors. Sandra Davis v. Thomas Cullen DavisFifth Circuit· 1999-03-17· cited 58×
- Culver, LLC v. Chiu (In Re Chiu)Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-23· cited 56×
- Goswami v. MTC Distributing (In Re Goswami)Ninth Circuit· 2003-12-31· cited 55×
- Lasich v. Estate of Wickstrom (In Re Wickstrom)W.D. Michigan· 1990-04-20· cited 54×
- Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-12· cited 53×
- Cisneros v. Kim (In Re Kim)Ninth Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 50×
- Hopkins v. Cerchione (In Re Cerchione)Ninth Circuit· 2009-09-08· cited 47×
- Lowe v. Yochem (In Re Reed)W.D. Texas· 1995-07-13· cited 44×
- Leppaluoto v. Combs (In Re Combs)Ninth Circuit· 1989-07-27· cited 43×
- Zimmerman v. MorganFourth Circuit· 1982-08-30· cited 41×
- Lester Shackman Shirkey, Jr. v. John G. Leake, TrusteeFourth Circuit· 1983-08-23· cited 40×
- In Re GubelmanSecond Circuit· 1925-12-07· cited 39×
- Tarrant v. Spenard Builders Supply, Inc. (In Re Tarrant)D. Alaska· 1982-04-08· cited 39×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court· 1915-11-29· cited 251×
- Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1912-01-09· cited 236×
- Everett v. JudsonSupreme Court· 1913-04-28· cited 170×
- In re YoungstromEighth Circuit· 1907-04-23· cited 15×
- Smith v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court· 1889-03-11· cited 6×
- Wright v. WestheimerIdaho Supreme Court· 1891-12-19· cited 6×
- Edgington v. TaylorEighth Circuit· 1920-12-20· cited 3×
- In re LehfeldtD. Montana· 1915-09-03· cited 2×
Other cases named White v. Stump
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.