CIM Ins. Corp. v. Masamitsu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interpreting the phrase “costs taxed against the insured” to exclude attorneys’ fees is consistent with Hawaii law
• finding that the negligent misrepresentation claim stemmed from intentional acts or contract-based claims
• “The negligent misrepresentation claim also did not trigger a duty to defend. Under the factual allegations of the counterclaim, it is clear that any claim of such ‘negligence’ stemmed from intentional acts or contract-based claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).