Skip to main content
· 3/25/1994

McLaughlin v. National Union Fire Insurance

Citations

  • 23 Cal. App. 4th 1132
  • 29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 559
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2145
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 4021
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to a tortious or wrongful attempt to cancel coverage when such action was arbitrary
  • duty to defend depends on fact in complaint; where only potential for liability turns on resolution of legal question, there is no duty to defend
  • “Damage for lost profits, loss of investment or other harm to one’s economic interest constitute injuries to intangible property which by definition fall outside the scope of the policy.”
  • “recovery of compensatory damages is not essential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.