Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an inference of minimal diversity based on the claim that “some ‘undetermined number’ of class members are ‘non-Illinois and non-Delaware citizens’”
• discussing amendment of notice of removal to cure 24 defective jurisdictional allegations
• conclusory invocation of CAFA is insufficient to establish subject-matter jurisdiction without specific factual allegations; remanding for jurisdictional discovery
• conclusory invocation of CAFA is insufficient to establish subject-matter jurisdiction without specific factual allegations
• existence of subject matter jurisdiction can be gleaned from record as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-12-18· cited 24×
• Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-10-09
• Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-12-18
• Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-12-18