Medical Assur. Co., Inc. v. Hellman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had properly pleaded diversity of citizenship by stating “on information and belief” that defendants were citizens of a particular state
• holding that plaintiff had properly pleaded diversity of citizenship by stating “on information and belief” that defendants were citizens of a particular state
• holding that plaintiff had properly pleaded diversity by stating “on information and belief” that defendants were citizens of a particular state
• holding that district court abused its discretion when it stayed a declaratory judgment action that was “sufficiently distinct from the issues that have arisen thus far in the state proceedings”
• noting that the perception of parallel proceedings in state court was an appropriate consideration for purposes of the Declaratory Judgment Act and abstention doctrines
• explaining that dismissal without prejudice is the proper course of action when a duty-to-indemnify claim is not ripe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).